Subscribe to RSS feed

Sep
04

Jerry Yang as Henry V That’s his choice

The fact is that Yahoo made a strategic choice when it rebuffed Microsoft and got into bed with Google. A year from now we’ll know whether that was the wise choice. In the meantime, Yang and Decker need to weed out the disgruntled and the half-hearted as quickly as possible. Anyone not willing to charge the hill and risk taking shrapnel ought to be encouraged to follow the rest who have opted to quit. Otherwise, they’ll have to redecorate the corporate corridors with an ancient Rome motif to fit with all the backstabbing bound to ensue.

(Credit:
Dan Farber/CNET News.com)

Still, CEO Jerry Yang and President Sue Decker–who appears to be the main architect of the changes–do have to try to give the company’s management structure a new shape for the challenges ahead and before the Aug. 1 annual meeting.

The worst thing Yahoo’s leadership could do is to dawdle enacting the big reorganization everyone seems to be expecting. Here’s an excerpt from Kara Swisher’s prescient post on the subject.

Sources all talk about a much more deep and profound managerial shift–rather than the deck-chair-arranging that has been typical of most Yahoo reorgs.
For those just checking into this drama, reorganizations are to Yahoo as floods are to Venice–inevitable, annoying and very unpleasant.

But before getting flagged for piling on, is the rush of recent departures at the company really is as bad as it appears to 99.9 percent of the blognoscenti? Let’s pause and think about that for a moment. With no disrespect to any of the people who are departing for greener pastures in the last couple of weeks, Yahoo’s not losing any superstars. (Check out Mike Arrington’s running tally of “former” Yahooers.)

From the outside looking in, it sure seems to be going from bad to worse at Yahoo, where Jerry Yang and Sue Decker appear unable to stop the hemorrhaging in the executive ranks.

Meanwhile, the clock keeps ticking and Yahoo’s press keeps getting worse. At this point, the battle for perception takes center stage. As I noted on another occasion, if ever there were a time for management to deliver a “band of brothers” speech to rouse the troops, this is the time. (Note to Yang & Team: If you’re stuck for inspiration, try Kenneth Branagh’s marvelous interpretation of Shakespeare’s Henry V.)

I do have a plan. Really!

Aug
31

Visual Studio Guy vs. SQL Server Gal

Visual Studio Guy

(Credit: MSDN)
Microsoft has created a series of cartoon superheros for your enjoyment. Must be nice to have all that marketing money.

The most disturbing thing is that I like the same band as Visual Studio Guy. Sigh.

I can only assume these characters battle “Blue Screen of Death” and “The Googlebot”

Aug
30

NSA chief downplays cybersecurity power grab repor

High-level officials understand the seriousness of cyberthreats and understand that “airplanes can’t fly if the network is down,” he said. “The biggest challenge is turning geek-speak into things they can understand.”

Instead, Alexander said, the Department of Homeland Security should continue to oversee Internet and computer security for civilian agencies, while the NSA would provide that service for military agencies.

On Tuesday, Alexander did note that the NSA “has tremendous technical abilities” and suggested that crisis management might benefit from centralization. “The question is: What happens in a time of crisis? We don’t have a way of seeing and sharing networks today in a timely manner.”

Other topics of discussion at the RSA conference included cyberattacks by foreign governments–a Wall Street Journal report on Tuesday said some sensitive files related to the Pentagon’s Joint Strike Fighter Project had been electronically viewed–and the recent Conficker worm.

The department has a lot of work to do to change the network protection policy from one based on bolting together disparate security tools to one where protective tools are interoperable and integrated, according to Lentz.

Alexander’s remarks come during a 60-day review of the federal government’s cybersecurity efforts ordered by President Obama that could end with responsibilities being reshuffled between agencies. Melissa Hathaway, who worked for the director of national intelligence in the Bush administration and is conducting the review, is scheduled to give a public talk on Wednesday.

CNET’s Elinor Mills contributed to this report.

SAN FRANCISCO–The director of the National Security Agency on Tuesday downplayed reports of the NSA’s attempt to wrest control of cybersecurity responsibilities from rival federal agencies.

The announcement of the review led to speculation that the White House’s National Security Council or NSA would be handed more cybersecurity responsibilities, along with a larger budget to carry them out. Although the 2002 law creating DHS centralized cybersecurity responsibilities, it has been repeatedly criticized by government auditors who concluded that DHS failed to live up to its responsibilities and may be “unprepared” for emergencies.

“We do not want to run cybersecurity for the U.S. government,” Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander said at the RSA security conference here.

Asked after his talk if he believed reports that Chinese cyber spies had
infiltrated the department’s network, Lentz said “probably.”

On Tuesday, Robert Lentz, chief information assurance officer for the Department of Defense, said the agency is attempting to protect 15,000 networks, 7 million computers, and 1.1 billion Defense Department Internet users worldwide. There are 360 million probes targeted at Defense Department networks each day, compared to the 1 million probes an average major U.S. bank gets per month, he said.

“2009 is the tipping point,” Lentz said. “The reality is the bad guys are going to be in our networks,” and officials have to figure out how to best detect and contain the threats, he said.

Much of Alexander’s remarks appeared to be a response to Rod Beckstrom, former director of Homeland Security’s National Cybersecurity Center, whose resignation letter last month blasted what he described as an NSA power grab that could threaten “our democratic processes.” That led some members of Congress — including the Democratic chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee — to object to NSA control, which Clinton-era FBI director Louis Freeh echoed a day later.

(Credit:
CNET/Declan McCullagh)

Within the next week or so the agency expects to have an identity assurance strategy that will include biometrics for authenticating identity of network users and identification of devices like routers and switches, he said.

Aug
30

Cryptographers speak of threats, voting, and Blu-R

Diffie began the discussion, saying that after 80 years, “we’ve gotten cryptography to a fairly good point,” but added that “the Internet’s a mess.” He said that on the Internet, “defense–pure defense–simply doesn’t work.” He said that where it takes us months and years to secure something, it takes the opponent only hours. “They can run rings around us.” He then mentioned that some in the government are starting to talk about going to where the opponents live and using a variety of means to shut them down.

Rivest briefly mentioned Alan Turing, to whom this year’s RSA conference is dedicated. Turing is best known for the Turing Test, a process that determines a machine’s ability to demonstrate intelligence. What Rivest really wanted to talk about, however, was electronic voting. He said cryptography is relevant to creating end-to-end security. He’s part of a group that has released a public proposal on voting system standards. One of the key parts is the definition of “dependent” and “independent” software on a voting system. He said software dependent is a category where a bug or a flaw could easily change the end result; this is along the lines of work done recently by Professor Ed Felten and his grad students at Princeton. Software independent is where the system doesn’t entirely depend on the software and uses paper or some other means of capturing the vote. He favors voting systems that are software independent.

First, panel members offered their perspectives on the state of security since last year, then they answered questions posed by a moderator. The panel included: Whitfield Diffie, chief security officer at Sun Microsystems; Martin Hellman, professor emeritus of electrical engineering at Stanford University; Ronald Rivest, professor of electrical engineering and computer science at MIT; and Adi Shamir, professor of computer science at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. The moderator was by Burt Kaliski, founding scientist at RSA Laboratories.

Hellman showed a photograph of a glider flying over a runway. Himself a pilot, he said the greatest risk was executing a maneuver that most people consider 99.9 percent safe. Hellman said that “humans are not good in judging low-probability events,” and cautioned against complacency. He said he hoped that the non-security world would reach a tipping point and start taking security seriously. (Malcolm Gladwell, author of The Tipping Point, is an RSA keynote speaker on Thursday.)

Shamir gave a short recitation of hacks within the last year or so on various cryptographic systems, mentioning in particular recent attacks on various municipal transit systems, such as Boston’s Charlie Card and London’s Oyster Card. Most curious, however, were his final comments about the adoption of Blu-Ray DVD discs by Warner Bros. He said he’d wondered about the tipping point in the Blu-Ray vs. HD DVD battle, and said he’d heard a rumor–and stressed it was only a rumor–that Blu-Ray had better security overall than HD DVD. If true, he said, security is finally starting to become a factor in consumer electronics.

On Tuesday, the creators of the Diffie-Hellman key exchange, a cryptographic protocol, and two of the creators of EMC security division RSA gathered onstage for the annual cryptographers’ panel at RSA 2008 in San Francisco.

Aug
26

Review Leander Kahney’s ‘Inside Steve’s Brain’

One nice innovation of Kahney’s book is to use the commentary of others, including some original interviews with former Apple employees and veteran Apple commentators, to draw informed conclusions about how Jobs arrived at a particular decision.

In fact, the book was originally titled Chairman Steve’s Little White Book, Kahney told me, but his publisher’s lawyers freaked out, worried that Jobs would sue, since that title implies that the book is an authorized biography. Indeed, Kahney said that Apple’s PR department contacted him to say Apple wouldn’t participate–even before he asked. And he also said that he had to sign a $1 million defamation and libel insurance policy as part of his book contract.

By delving into the intellect and the thought processes behind Jobs–including his approach to hiring, firing, product development, marketing, and such things–Kahney gives readers a way to draw lessons from the storied career of Jobs.

The user experience–and the ways that Jobs focuses on it–is a major theme of the book. Again and again, Kahney uses anecdotes and quotes to illustrate that at the core of Jobs’ thinking is a committed, if somewhat maniacal, desire to give those smart enough to be Apple customers the world’s best customer experience.

And now into the mix comes Inside Steve’s Brain, by Wired News editor Leander Kahney, the latest attempt to distill the mysteries of Apple’s enigmatic co-founder and CEO.

And for anyone who wants to understand how that happened, this book paints a pretty good picture of the intellect and intellectual processes that got Jobs, Apple, and the many top-flight people who work there where they are.

In one anecdote explaining the way Jobs rules by intimidation and fear–a common thread throughout the book and in other Jobs biographies and articles–Kahney relates a story from a 2000 Apple sales rep gathering. Using quotes from former Apple engineer Edward Eigerman, he shows how Jobs verbally dressed down a sales rep for losing a contract to Hewlett-Packard.

But Kahney doesn’t leave it at that. Rather, he continues and explains how Jobs’ mindset had led to this rare disaster, talking about how Jobs has always liked incorporating cubes in his work–the NeXT Cube and the huge glass cube that rises above Apple’s Fifth Avenue store in Manhattan–and that while Jobs tries to always focus on the user experience, he lost sight of how this particular product didn’t really have a place in the market.

I came away from those lessons wondering if the benefits of behaving like that is worth the downside. It’s true that Jobs is one of the most respected people in business, but then again, how many people want to punch his lights out? Probably more than just a few.

If you’ve read any of the previous Jobs biographies, or articles about him, much of Inside Steve’s Brain will feel familiar to you. Yet, Kahney’s approach to the subject matter is refreshing and provides new context to what has previously been presented as mere business fact.

“The Cube was Jobs’ baby: a beautifully designed, technically advanced machine that represented months, maybe years, of prototyping and experimentation,” Kahney wrote. “But aside from a few design museums, few were interested in it. At about $2,000, it was too expensive for most consumers, who wanted a cheap monitor-less Mac like the Mac mini that succeeded it…Jobs had badly misjudged the market. The Cube was the wrong machine at the wrong price. In January 2001, Apple reported a quarterly loss of $247 million, the first since Jobs had returned to the company. He was stung.”

There was also, of course, Forbes writer Daniel Lyons’ (aka “Fake Steve Jobs”) 2007 parody, oPtion$: The secret life of Steve Jobs.

Among them is an examination of the doomed Mac Cube, a product that received stellar critical praise but barely sold.

My quick takeaway from Kahney’s book is that while it covers a lot of ground that has been well explored by others, it also picks up where Deutschman, Young, and Simon left off, and takes us into the present–the era of the
iPhone, the MacBookPro, the backdating scandal, and much more. Essentially, as influential as Apple was when the previous biographies were published, it is now a more important technology company than ever before, and Inside Steve’s Brain catches us up. And rather than talk about Apple and Jobs from an outsider’s perspective, it attempts to tell the story from, well, inside Jobs’ psyche–explaining his thought process and his motivations and culling lessons that can be learned along the way.

The genre has been highlighted by titles such as Alan Deutschman’s 2000 book, The Second Coming of Steve Jobs and 2005′s iCon: Steve Jobs, The Greatest Second Act in the History of Business by Jeffrey Young and William Simon. The latter was attacked by Jobs himself for being an unauthorized biography, and by Deutschman for being eerily similar to his own book.

I do feel that Kahney’s publisher let him down a little bit with less-than-stellar editing. As someone who has written a book myself, I know that authors depend on editors to make sure that things appear just right on the printed page. And throughout Inside Steve’s Brain, readers come across many sets of facts or anecdotes multiple times, something that will slightly annoy the alert reader. These kinds of things are the printed page equivalent, as a professor of mine once declared, of seeing a microphone boom sticking out of the top of the screen in a movie. And Kahney’s editors should have done more to help avoid this.

Still, the point of Inside Steve’s Brain is to give students of the technology business an–albeit unauthorized–insider’s view of how Jobs and Apple have risen to the top of the heap. Some might argue that Apple isn’t really at the top, given that its computers are still far outsold by Windows machines, but few could argue that Apple has not achieved amazing successes in business in the last few years or that with its digital lifestyle strategy it is not years ahead of everyone else and laying the path that other companies will follow.

In fact, most of the book’s seven chapters conclude with a bullet-pointed cheat sheet of “Lessons from Steve.”

But in the end, I found the book to be enjoyable, well-written, very informative and, most important, up to date. Jobs will no doubt always be a source of fascination to many people, and it’s a treat to get a volume like this, with a unique approach, about him, from someone as steeped in Apple’s culture and history as Kahney.

Some of the lessons may be hard for anyone other than Jobs to employ with any effect. Those include: “It’s OK to be an a–hole, as long as you’re passionate about it. Jobs screams and shouts, but it comes from his drive to change the world; use the carrot and the stick to get great work. Jobs praises and punishes as everyone rides the hero/a–hole rollercoaster; become a great intimidatr. Inspire through fear and a desire to please.”

(Credit:
Portfolio )

For years, the Steve Jobs biography has been a staple of the technology business publishing press.

Leander Kahney’s new biography of Steve Jobs is built around insight into the Apple CEO’s thought process.

Instead, Kahney relies on numerous interviews with Jobs from previously published articles. And I must say, he uses these interviews to very nice effect. One trick of the book intended, no doubt to avoid getting the reader bogged down in attribution language, is that it uses copious footnotes. This allows Kahney to weave in many quotes from Jobs and others and have it all fit in seamlessly into the narrative.

Does it work? I would say so. I came away from the book feeling like I had a better understanding of Apple’s successes and failures of the past 30 years, as well as how the thought processes in Jobs’ mind have directly influenced so much of what has gone on in Cupertino, Calif.–where the company is headquartered–and the lives of the millions of people who use Macs, iPods, and iPhones.

The book itself comes in an unusual form factor. It is small–about 7-1/4 inches by 5-1/4 inches–and seems almost bible-sized.

And while Eigerman said he was impressed by the sales rep having stood up for herself, Kahney wrote, “Perhaps most significantly, the public humiliation of the unfortunate rep put the fear of God into all the other sales reps. It sent a clear message that everybody at Apple is held personally accountable.”

Ultimately, Jobs’ lack of participation in the book is disappointing, though not at all surprising. It makes writing a book that purports to explain the Apple CEO’s mental processes all the more challenging without being able to include direct and original interviews.

For example, at the end of the chapter titled, “Elitism: Hire Only A Players, Fire the Bozos,” Kahney culls these lessons: “Work in small teams. Jobs doesn’t like teams of more than 100 members, lest they become unfocused and unmanageable; don’t listen to yes men. Argument and debate foster creative thinking. Jobs wants partners who challenge his ideas; engage in intellectual combat. Jobs makes decisions by fighting about ideas. It’s hard and demanding, but rigorous and effective.”

As I mentioned above, there is a lot in Inside Steve’s Brain that is familiar ground for veteran Jobs followers. But there is also plenty that is new, especially in the approach to telling the story.

Kahney is a longtime Apple reporter and has written two previous books on the company and its products–The Cult of
Mac and The Cult of
iPod. And there is little doubt that he is both a fan of the company’s products and fascinated by Jobs’ machinations.

So while it is standard fare in books like this to devote endless pages to Jobs’ well-chronicled strategy of inspiring great work by engendering great fear–something Kahney does at great length–it was refreshing to also see him mix his admiration with sections on some of Jobs’ failures.

Aug
26

Microsoft Vista SP1 ready for download

As for other means of getting SP1, Microsoft plans to start pushing out Service Pack 1 next month to Vista users who have automatic updates turned on. As for when new PCs will start carrying it, that is still a bit unclear, with Microsoft noting that it takes time for PC makers to update their assembly lines, but also saying they can use the new code “when they are ready.” Microsoft finalized Vista Service Pack 1 back in February.

Meanwhile, in a posting on the Windows Vista blog, Microsoft also went into a little more detail on a previously disclosed driver problem that may prevent some drivers that work in Windows Vista from working with Service Pack 1. Microsoft also posted a list of potentially problematic drivers.

Still unclear is when it will start being available on retail shelves. Amazon said it will start shipping boxed copies with SP1 included on Wednesday, while Microsoft said it will be at retailers “as soon as April.” I’ve asked for further clarification on the disparity, but have yet to hear back.

Microsoft said some drivers have already been updated to fix the incompatibility.

So, you may or may not be able to get SP1 starting today. For those whose systems are able to get SP1, the update is available in five languages: English, French, Spanish, German, and Japanese.

Well, Amazon was at least half right. As the retailer predicted, Microsoft did make
Windows Vista Service Pack 1 available for download on Tuesday via Windows Update and on its Web site.

“We’re working with the providers of the remaining devices to get updated versions of the drivers to our customers as well,” Microsoft product manager Nick White said on the Vista blog. “In the meantime, Windows Update will recognize PCs with drivers that may be problematic and postpone offering SP1 to those PCs until it has installed corrected drivers or other applicable updates. Either way, Windows Update works to detect whether or not your system is ready for SP1 and not offer it to you until the time is right.”

Aug
24

Can Microsoft make Silverlight shine

Over time, Goldfarb said there’s the possibility of further integration, such as having the help videos in Office 2008 use Silverlight.

One cool Silverlight feature is the Deep Zoom, which lets users browse images and zoom into the ones they want, in this case the memorabilia collection at the Hard Rock Cafe.

The tie with Office is somewhat tenuous, however. Silverlight is part of the standard installation of Office 2008 for Mac. Office itself doesn’t use Silverlight, although the highest-end version of Office now comes with a product called Expression Media, which does make use of Silverlight, Goldfarb said.

Microsoft also uses Silverlight as part of the latest version of the MSN Toolbar, using it to offer display dynamic content, such as RSS feeds.

One of the earliest examples of Microsoft distributing Silverlight with other products: the new version of Office for
Mac that shipped earlier this year.

“We are working with a broad cross section of our product groups,” he said, adding that evangelizing Silverlight across the company is still a challenge, even though CEO Steve Ballmer has highlighted the technology as key to its future. “It’s a big ship to start turning around.”

While Microsoft showed some impressive technologies at its recent Mix ’08 conference, DeMichillie said most Web developers want to see a lot more eyeballs before they are willing to consider an alternative to Flash. “If Flash is on 98 percent and Silverlight is on 10 percent, you don’t even get to the merits of Silverlight. You just pick Flash.”

Goldfarb wouldn’t say what percentage of machines he thought were running Silverlight, pointing to the momentum numbers given out at Mix that Microsoft was generating 1.5 million downloads of Silverlight per day.

“Overall, our intention is to use the Web to distribute Silverlight which offers an easy download experience that takes less than 10 seconds to install but we will also work closely with channel distributors to preinstall Silverlight as appropriate,” he added.

The other is a debate on Silverlight’s technical merits vis-a-vis Flash. “Obviously the second conversation is the one I really want to have–why Silverlight is better,” said Goldfarb, a group product manager in Microsoft’s developer division.

Goldfarb, like Microsoft, is keenly aware though, that until Silverlight fares better on the first front, many Web developers won’t spend much time worrying about the second question.

“What I want to avoid is arbitrarily pushing things on people’s machines,” he said. “Apple just jammed Safari 3.1 down as part of iTunes.”

(Credit:
Dan Farber/CNET News.com)

Goldfarb acknowledges that there are many considerations in trying to decide which products to include Silverlight with, noting that people are sensitive to having software thrust upon them.

Another potential vehicle for distribution is convincing computer makers to preload Silverlight onto new PCs.

“Microsoft is already talking with leading (computer makers),” Goldfarb said, adding that the company has developed software that PC makers can use to preinstall Silverlight on new machines. Microsoft also signed a deal with Nokia to distribute a version of Silverlight for mobile phones.

“The OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) will preinstall anything if you pay them,” he said.

Goldfarb said the response from Web developers convinces him that Microsoft is on the right path. “We’ve already started to change the dialogue,” he said. “People are believing. It’s not a matter of ‘if’, it’s a matter of ‘when,’ and ‘when’ isn’t that far away.”

One is centered on market share and the fact that Adobe Systems’ Flash is nearly ubiquitous on Internet-connected PCs, while Microsoft’s rival technology is still on only a minority of devices.

That conversation typically starts out something like this: “You’re not on 98 percent of machines like Adobe, so why should we care?”

Attracting mainstream developers
Greg DeMichillie, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, said that if Microsoft is willing to pay, computer makers will be willing to include Silverlight.

“The magic number seems to be something like 80 percent,” he said. “I’ve heard that from various Web developers.”

DeMichillie said that whatever its strategy, Microsoft needs to get Silverlight on more than three-quarters of Web-connected PCs to really get mainstream developer attention.

When Microsoft’s Brian Goldfarb talks about Silverlight, he is usually having one of two types of conversations.

Microsoft is taking several approaches to trying to boost Silverlight’s distribution, ranging from striking third-party deals like its pact to power the NBC Olympics Web site to bundling Silverlight into other Microsoft products.

Although Goldfarb didn’t use the word “bundling,” he did say Microsoft is actively trying to get other product groups within the company to adopt Silverlight in some way and then distribute it as part of their product.

Aug
22

Welcome to the club FriendFeed launches its API

This is certainly an important step for FriendFeed. The closely related service, Twitter, has benefited greatly from providing support for third-party developers, so FriendFeed should see a similar bump from the introduction of its API.

It’s going to be very interesting to see what developers can do with this API, given the wealth of quality data that FriendFeed brings together.

I think we all saw this one coming. The hottest social aggregator out there today, FriendFeed, has launched an application programming interface, paving the way for third-party applications using its service. Full documentation for the API is available on Google Code.

FriendFeed’s API currently offers PHP and Python libraries, with support for OAuth apparently on the way. In making the API, FriendFeed also took feedback from some developer influentials, such as Dave Winer.

FriendFeed’s API will bring this data to a larger audience.

To give some examples of what its API can do, the FriendFeeders told us, “You can develop a FriendFeed interface for a mobile phone, build a FriendFeed widget for your blog, or develop an application that makes it easy to post photos to your feed from your
iPhone.”

(Credit: FriendFeed)

Aug
22

AeroVironment flies ahead with ‘nano’ air vehicle

While DARPA and Monrovia, Calif.-based AeroVironment cite biomimickry–that is, drawing on designs found in nature–as a central concept for NAVs, the NAV sketch on the AeroVironment site looks predominantly like a classic airplane-dropped bomb–with gossamer wings tacked on. (Sort of like the wings that Wile E. Coyote strapped on in one of his cartoon pursuits of Road Runner.)

The Phase II contract involves a six-month, $636,000 development program that AeroVironment, which also makes wind turbines for civilian use, says will result in “a rudimentary, three-inch flapping-wing air vehicle system.” (Phase I was a $1.7 million program.) If a demo of the NAV is successful, DARPA would have the option to extend the program for 18 months.

Unmanned aerial vehicles are becoming a big deal for the armed forces, even when they’re really small.

The Wasp III is now serving with the Air Force.

AeroVironment said Tuesday that it has gotten the go-ahead, in the form of a Phase II contract, to design and build a teeny-tiny prototype for the Nano Air Vehicle program at DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. How teeny? The defense R&D agency stipulates that a NAV must be smaller than 7.5 centimeters (2.9 inches) and, at no more than 10 grams (one-third of an ounce), “ultralightweight.”

AeroVironment has already created small–but not “nano”–UAVs for the Pentagon, including the Raven and the Wasp. A “micro” air vehicle, or MAV, the Wasp can be remotely controlled or programmed for GPS-based autonomous navigation, and it carries a pair of on-board cameras. The Air Force took delivery of its first “BATMAV” (for the Battlefield Air Targeting Micro Air Vehicle program), the Wasp III–with a strapping 29-inch wingspan and weighing in at 1 pound–from the company in 2007.

A key eventual mission for NAVs would be military operations in urban environments, with the insect-sized aircraft capable of performing surveillance and reconnaissance both inside buildings and in the open air. In addition, DARPA says, “the program will advance technologies that enable collision avoidance and navigation systems for use in GPS-denied indoor and outdoor environments and develop efficient methods for hovering flight and deployment or emplacement of sensors.”

(Credit:
AeroVironment)

AeroVironment is set to design and build a 3-inch nano air vehicle for DARPA.

(Credit:
U.S. Air Force)

Aug
22

Why does this e-book cost $14 !

(Credit:
Amazon)

That’s the end of my diatribe. Over to you, readers. Would you buy more e-books if they cost just a buck or two? Would you be more likely to buy, say, a Kindle if cheap books were part of the deal? I eagerly await your thoughts on the subject.

Dear e-book publishers: stop gouging us.

It’s time for that to change.

Find more deals, coupon codes, and bargains on CNET’s Shopper.com.

I will not buy “This is Where I Leave You” for $14.01. At $9.95, I have to think about it. For $2.99, publisher Dutton Adult, by way of Amazon or eReader or whoever, would already have my money. And probably a lot more, as I’d be snapping up books left and right.

One final thought: at the same time you’re raking in newfound profits, publishers, you’ll be creating a more literate, well-read society. Not a bad perk, eh?

Explain to me, then, why the e-book edition of “This is Where I Leave You” sells for $14.01. The $.01 suggests there must be some calculation at work, some formula you use to determine that Kindle and iPhone owners get to save all of a buck-fifty-six when they read green.

I also understand the concept of perceived value. If you make e-books cheap, that cheapens the value of books in general, right? No. Wrong. Hogwash. That’s 20th century thinking.

Now, I understand books cost money. There’s editing, publishing, and distribution. Paper, ink, trucks, gasoline. Storage, shipping, shelf space, sales staff. And the countless people involved in all those transactions.

Let’s get some perspective. Publishers have vast libraries of old, forgotten books that are generating zero income, or close to it. Why can’t I buy e-book editions for 99 cents? Last I checked, some revenue was better than no revenue.

Readers, it’s time for you to step up and letter-bomb both booksellers and publishers, to let them know you’ve got money to spend on books, but want fair prices.

Case in point: I just read a glowing review of Jonathan Tropper’s “This is Where I Leave You.” I’m sold; I want it. But something’s amiss here: Amazon’s hardcover price is $15.57, while the Kindle edition sells for $14.01.

Look, I’m your biggest fan. I’ve been reading digitally distributed fiction and non-fiction since the early days of the PalmPilot.

E-books, on the other hand, consume zero trees. They weigh nothing, occupy no physical space, and don’t get shipped in the traditional sense. Middlemen are few and far between. So you’re left with, what, editing costs and the pittance you pay the authors?

Why aren’t best sellers priced at, say, $2.99? That’s an impulse-buy price, one that would encourage readers to pony up instead of waiting weeks or months to check out the one print copy the library bought.

(By the way, bargain hunters, eReader.com sells “This is Where I Leave You” for $9.95–still disproportionately high, but more reasonable at least.)

The most frequently used apps on my
iPhone, bar none, are Kindle, eReader, and Stanza.

This isn’t a new phenomenon. For as long as I’ve been reading them, e-books have cost nearly as much as their print siblings.

Apple figured out that 99 cents was the magic price point for songs and managed to strong-arm record labels into letting it sell at that point. Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Sony–it’s time for you step up and convince book publishers to do likewise.

I’m no businessman (English major, natch), but even I understand the economics of volume. Want to sell more e-books? Lower the prices. Forget how things work in the physical world, where selling more books means more production, more shipping, more consumables. E-books require none of that. The only real “consumable” is bandwidth, and there’s no shortage of that.

But I’m getting increasingly frustrated with e-book prices, which rarely represent a savings over their print (aka dead-tree) counterparts.

Amazon inexplicably charges nearly as much for the e-book edition as for the hardcover.

Older posts «